Experiment and the Development of the Theory of Weak Interactions: Fermi’s Theory

Authors(s):Allan Franklin Publication:Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 1986 Publication Date:1986 Publisher: Philosophy of Science Association Citation:PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 1986, [University of Chicago Press, Springer, Philosophy of Science Association], 1986 Link:JSTOR

The fallibility and corrigibility of experimental results, and of the confirmation or refutation based on those results, is illustrated in the 1930's history of Fermi's theory of decay. Early results favored the competing theory of Konopinski and Uhlenbeck. It was found that there were experimental difficulties along with an incorrect theoretical comparison. When the experiments were corrected and the proper theoretical calculations made, the evidence favored Fermi and refuted Konopinski and Uhlenbeck. The relevance of known evidence for confirmation and the value of ad hoc hypotheses is also discussed.